<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hotfix Lets W32time Sync with Very High Precision NTP Servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/</link>
	<description>Custom Software and I.T. Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Mark, we haven&#039;t applied the update so I don&#039;t know what caused the errors all of a sudden.  I did check to see that we have &quot;later&quot; versions of the hotfix files.  Since I added the /update to the config statement it is working fine.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, we haven&#8217;t applied the update so I don&#8217;t know what caused the errors all of a sudden.  I did check to see that we have &#8220;later&#8221; versions of the hotfix files.  Since I added the /update to the config statement it is working fine.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 08:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Rick, have you applied the hotfix?  If the servers you are using recently upgraded to very high precision, that could explain the sudden errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, have you applied the hotfix?  If the servers you are using recently upgraded to very high precision, that could explain the sudden errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 08:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Just an update.  I addeed /update to the command...

w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:&quot;206.112.100.146,0x8 69.25.96.13,0x8&quot; /syncfromflags:MANUAL /reliable:yes /update

and it works better now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an update.  I addeed /update to the command&#8230;</p>
<p>w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:&#8221;206.112.100.146,0&#215;8 69.25.96.13,0&#215;8&#8243; /syncfromflags:MANUAL /reliable:yes /update</p>
<p>and it works better now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 05:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I am also getting events 38 and 47 with many different time servers on my 2003 server.  This just started happening last week.  I tried using...

w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:&quot;206.112.100.146,0x8 69.25.96.13,0x8&quot; /syncfromflags:MANUAL /reliable:yes

which is the last setting you are using Mark with IPs instead of names.  Now, when I do a resync, I get &quot;the computer did not resync because no time data was available.  I have used IPs before so it&#039;s not that.  What has changed the past week or so? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also getting events 38 and 47 with many different time servers on my 2003 server.  This just started happening last week.  I tried using&#8230;</p>
<p>w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:&#8221;206.112.100.146,0&#215;8 69.25.96.13,0&#215;8&#8243; /syncfromflags:MANUAL /reliable:yes</p>
<p>which is the last setting you are using Mark with IPs instead of names.  Now, when I do a resync, I get &#8220;the computer did not resync because no time data was available.  I have used IPs before so it&#8217;s not that.  What has changed the past week or so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-67</guid>
		<description>A few times this past week, a server has been reporting that it couldn&#039;t get time from nist1.symmetricom.com (W32Time Warning Event ID 47).  I found this helpful link of which servers are busy:

http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi

nist1.symmetricom.com is not listed as busy, but the other server mentioned in the original article, time-b.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov, is listed as VERY busy.  I also see that there is a server in Los Angeles, even closer to my San Diego location.  So I&#039;m changing my time servers using these commands:

w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:&quot;nist1-la.WiTime.net,0x8 nist1.symmetricom.com,0x8&quot; /syncfromflags:MANUAL
net stop w32time
net start w32time
w32tm /resync</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few times this past week, a server has been reporting that it couldn&#8217;t get time from nist1.symmetricom.com (W32Time Warning Event ID 47).  I found this helpful link of which servers are busy:</p>
<p><a href="http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi" rel="nofollow">http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi</a></p>
<p>nist1.symmetricom.com is not listed as busy, but the other server mentioned in the original article, time-b.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov, is listed as VERY busy.  I also see that there is a server in Los Angeles, even closer to my San Diego location.  So I&#8217;m changing my time servers using these commands:</p>
<p>w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:&#8221;nist1-la.WiTime.net,0&#215;8 nist1.symmetricom.com,0&#215;8&#8243; /syncfromflags:MANUAL<br />
net stop w32time<br />
net start w32time<br />
w32tm /resync</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that link.  In this context, &quot;very high precision&quot; just means any server with a precision less than -30 (since it&#039;s negative, a value less than -30, e.g. -31, indicates higher precision).  Probably more likely in the NIST/Level 1 servers, but theoretically any server could return very high precision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that link.  In this context, &#8220;very high precision&#8221; just means any server with a precision less than -30 (since it&#8217;s negative, a value less than -30, e.g. -31, indicates higher precision).  Probably more likely in the NIST/Level 1 servers, but theoretically any server could return very high precision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcr</title>
		<link>http://www.mcbsys.com/techblog/2007/11/hotfix-lets-w32time-sync-with-very-high-precision-ntp-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>pcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/mark/post/Hotfix-Lets-W32time-Sync-with-Very-High-Precision-NTP-Servers.aspx#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if &quot;very high precision&quot; translates to the Level 1 and Level 2 servers. At any rate, here&#039;s a long list of servers.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/262680
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if &#8220;very high precision&#8221; translates to the Level 1 and Level 2 servers. At any rate, here&#8217;s a long list of servers.</p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/262680" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/262680</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

